Can the onset of type 2 diabetes be delayed by a group-based lifestyle intervention in women with prediabetes following gestational diabetes mellitus (gdm)? findings from a randomized control mixed methods trial
O’Dea, Angela ; Tierney, Marie ; McGuire, Brian E. ; Newell, John ; Glynn, Liam G. ; Gibson, Irene ; Noctor, Eoin ; Danyliv, Andrii ; Connolly, Susan B. ; Dunne, Fidelma P.
O’Dea, Angela
Tierney, Marie
McGuire, Brian E.
Newell, John
Glynn, Liam G.
Gibson, Irene
Noctor, Eoin
Danyliv, Andrii
Connolly, Susan B.
Dunne, Fidelma P.
Publication Date
2015-01-01
Type
Article
Downloads
Citation
O’Dea, Angela; Tierney, Marie; McGuire, Brian E. Newell, John; Glynn, Liam G.; Gibson, Irene; Noctor, Eoin; Danyliv, Andrii; Connolly, Susan B.; Dunne, Fidelma P. (2015). Can the onset of type 2 diabetes be delayed by a group-based lifestyle intervention in women with prediabetes following gestational diabetes mellitus (gdm)? findings from a randomized control mixed methods trial. Journal of Diabetes Research ,
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate a 12-week group-based lifestyle intervention programme for women with prediabetes following gestational diabetes (GDM). Design. A two-group, mixed methods randomized controlled trial in which 50 women with a history of GDM and abnormal glucose tolerance postpartum were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 24) or wait control (n = 26) and postintervention qualitative interviews with participants. Main Outcome Measures. Modifiable biochemical, anthropometric, behavioural, and psychosocial risk factors associated with the development of type 2 diabetes. The primary outcome variable was the change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from study entry to one-year follow-up. Results. At one-year follow-up, the intervention group showed significant improvements over the wait control group on stress, diet self-efficacy, and quality of life. There was no evidence of an effect of the intervention on measures of biochemistry or anthropometry; the effect on one health behaviour, diet adherence, was close to significance. Conclusions. Prevention programmes must tackle the barriers to participation faced by this population; home-based interventions should be investigated. Strategies for promoting long-term health self-management need to be developed and tested.
Funder
Publisher
Hindawi Limited
Publisher DOI
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland