Exploring lived experiences of individuals in supportive accommodation for individuals with mental disorders: A mixed-method study
Maloney, Lisa
Maloney, Lisa
Loading...
Identifiers
http://hdl.handle.net/10379/18105
https://doi.org/10.13025/16390
https://doi.org/10.13025/16390
Repository DOI
Publication Date
2024-03-19
Type
Thesis
Downloads
Citation
Abstract
Supportive accommodation for people with mental disorders has received limited research attention. Notably, prior research has relied disproportionately on quantitative measures, that do not provide a comprehensive and holistic understanding of resident lived experiences. It is essential that residents have opportunities to voice their opinions, concerns, and perspectives regarding their treatment and care. This not only aligns with the recovery ethos, but also demonstrates respect for residents, by recognising the value and worth of their perspectives. Thus, this mixed-method study investigated the functionality of 11 supported housing residences. Quantitative measures were utilised, followed by six phenomenologically informed focus groups. Findings revealed a concerning lack of recovery oriented practices and philosophies in residents’ overall treatment and care. This has greatly impacted on residents’ lives, who are maintained in a stagnant environment that limits autonomy, impedes recovery and rehabilitation and violates human rights. There is an urgent need for governments, stakeholders, mental health professionals and policymakers to focus their attention on successfully implementing recovery and human rights-based practices. These include respecting human rights and encouraging empowerment and self-determination of individuals residing in supportive accommodation for people with mental disorders. Future qualitative research should explore the quality of life and lived experiences of residents in supportive accommodation. Thus, their individual needs, goals, and challenges can be understood in order to better tailor treatment and care to their actual needs, rather than based on their perceived needs as determined by policy makers.
Funder
Publisher
NUI Galway