Publication

The complexity of procedural fidelity in precision teaching: A qualitative analysis

Diffley, Shauna
Kubina Jr, Richard M.
Noone, Chris
Quinlivan, Sinéad
Mc Tiernan, Aoife
Citation
Diffley, Shauna, Kubina, Richard M., Noone, Chris, Quinlivan, Sinéad, & Mc Tiernan, Aoife. (2025). The complexity of procedural fidelity in precision teaching: A qualitative analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-025-01050-3
Abstract
Precision Teaching (PT) is a system that involves precisely defining and measuring the frequency of behavior to facilitate timely and effective data-based decisions to accelerate behavioral repertoires (Evans et al., Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(3), 559–576 2021). When combined with instruction and practice approaches, PT has demonstrated efficacy in accelerating learning in academic skills. However, its use in public schools is minimal. One reason for this may be the limited amount of research exploring teacher-implemented PT and how PT fits within the context of busy classrooms. Procedural fidelity is an important concept to consider when procedures are implemented in complex and uncontrolled environments. The present study employed qualitative methods to explore expert practitioners’ and researchers’ perspectives on procedural fidelity, fidelity errors, and their perceived impact when implementing PT. The data were thematically analyzed and are discussed with regard to three overarching themes and their subthemes: (a) The Complexity of Procedural Fidelity in PT, (b) Maintaining Fidelity without Losing Flexibility, and (c) It’s a System. This study is an initial exploration of expert perspectives on procedural fidelity in PT, which can help inform future quantitative evaluations of the impact of fidelity errors on participant outcomes. Findings suggest that participants believed PT is a flexible system tolerant of some fidelity errors but that no component of the system should be omitted completely. Implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed alongside the strengths and limitations of this study.
Publisher
Springer
Publisher DOI
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International