Optimal port site skin closure method following minimally-invasive surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
Kerin, Eoin P. ; Davey, M. G. ; Bouz Mkabaah, L. ; Donlon, N. E.
Kerin, Eoin P.
Davey, M. G.
Bouz Mkabaah, L.
Donlon, N. E.
Loading...
Files
Loading...
Manuscript.pdf
Adobe PDF, 1.59 MB
Publication Date
2025-08-01
Keywords
Type
journal article
Downloads
Citation
Kerin, E. P., Davey, M. G., Mkabaah, L. Bouz, & Donlon, N. E. (2025). Optimal port site skin closure method following minimally-invasive surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. The American Journal of Surgery, 248, 116542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116542
Abstract
Background
For minimally-invasive surgery (MIS), there are numerous acceptable port-site closure techniques with no consensus on the method used.
Aim
To identify optimal port site postoperative wound closure method following MIS with respect to complication rates and cosmetic outcome.
Methods
Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed in accordance with PRISMA-NMA guidelines for RCTs comparing at least two methods of port-site closure.
Results
Nineteen RCTs were identified evaluating eight methods of wound closure in 1,932 patients; across three types of suture, three forms of tissue glue, staples and paper-tape. At NMA, there was no significant difference in wound complication, infection, dehiscence or pain rate irrespective of closure method, albeit a trend towards higher rate of dehiscence for adhesives. At NMA, wound cosmesis was superior for adhesives at both early and late postoperative follow-up.
Conclusion
This study validates the use of tissue adhesives with respect to primary closure of port sites following MIS while highlighting potential associated risks.
Funder
Publisher
Elsevier
Publisher DOI
Rights
CC BY