Publication

Who decides what criteria are important to consider in exploring the outcomes of Conversation Approaches? A Participatory Health Research Study.

Mc Menamin, Ruth
; 
Tierney, Edel
; 
Mac Farlane, Anne
Thumbnail Image
Files
Thumbnail Image
Who decides what criteria are important to consider in exploring the.pdf
Adobe PDF, 694.96 KB
Identifiers
http://hdl.handle.net/10379/5647
 https://doi.org/10.13025/22287
Publication Date
2015-02-06
Keywords
Aphasia, Participatory research, Qualitative, Health science
Type
Article
Downloads
Show all metadata
Citation
Ruth Mc Menamin, Edel Tierney & Anne Mac Farlane (2015): “Who decides what criteria are important to consider in exploring the outcomes of conversation approaches? A participatory health research study”, Aphasiology, DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1006564
Abstract
Approximately 176,000 new individuals in the United Kingdom and Ireland are diagnosed with stroke annually with up to one third experiencing aphasia. Qualitative research methods are increasingly used to capture the complexity of service users’ experiences of health and illness; however, the voice of service users with aphasia continues to be limited in published healthcare literature. This participatory research study included people with aphasia as co-researchers in the exploration of aphasia and a Conversation Partner Programme (CPP)
Funder
|~|Health Research Board|~|
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Publisher DOI
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
cbn
Collections
Speech and Language Therapy (Scholarly Articles)