Prognostic factors in advanced cancer patients: evidence-based clinical recommendations—a study by the steering committee of the european association for palliative care
Maltoni, Marco Caraceni, Augusto Brunelli, Cinzia Broeckaert, Bert Christakis, Nicholas Eychmueller, Steffen Glare, Paul Nabal, Maria Viganò, Antonio Larkin, Philip
Maltoni, Marco
Caraceni, Augusto
Brunelli, Cinzia
Broeckaert, Bert
Christakis, Nicholas
Eychmueller, Steffen
Glare, Paul
Nabal, Maria
Viganò, Antonio
Larkin, Philip
Publication Date
2005-09-01
Type
Article
Downloads
Citation
Maltoni, Marco; Caraceni, Augusto; Brunelli, Cinzia; Broeckaert, Bert; Christakis, Nicholas; Eychmueller, Steffen; Glare, Paul; Nabal, Maria; Viganò, Antonio; Larkin, Philip; De Conno, Franco; Hanks, Geoffrey; Kaasa, Stein (2005). Prognostic factors in advanced cancer patients: evidence-based clinical recommendations—a study by the steering committee of the european association for palliative care. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 (25), 6240-6248
Abstract
Purpose To offer evidence-based clinical recommendations concerning prognosis in advanced cancer patients. Methods A Working Group of the Research Network of the European Association for Palliative Care identified clinically significant topics, reviewed the studies, and assigned the level of evidence. A formal meta-analysis was not feasible because of the heterogeneity of published studies and the lack of minimal standards in reporting results. A systematic electronic literature search within the main available medical literature databases was performed for each of the following four areas identified: clinical prediction of survival (CPS), biologic factors, clinical signs and symptoms and psychosocial variables, and prognostic scores. Only studies on patients with advanced cancer and survival <= 90 days were included. Results A total of 38 studies were evaluated. Level A evidence-based recommendations of prognostic correlation could be formulated for CPS (albeit with a series of limitations of which clinicians must be aware) and prognostic scores. Recommendations on the use of other prognostic factors, such as performance status, symptoms associated with cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (weight loss, anorexia, dysphagia, and xerostomia), dyspnea, delirium, and some biologic factors (leukocytosis, lymphocytopenia, and C-reactive protein), reached level B. Conclusion Prognostication of life expectancy is a significant clinical commitment for clinicians involved in oncology and palliative care. More accurate prognostication is feasible and can be achieved by combining clinical experience and evidence from the literature. Using and communicating prognostic information should be part of a multidisciplinary palliative care approach.
Funder
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publisher DOI
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland