Publication

Performance measurement systems as generators of cognitive conflict in ambidextrous firms

Bedford, David S.
; 
Bisbe, Josep
; 
Sweeney, Breda
Thumbnail Image
Files
Thumbnail Image
Aran_version_of_AOS_paper.pdf
Adobe PDF, 1.09 MB
Repository DOI
Publication Date
2018-06-21
Keywords
Performance measurement systems, Cognitive conflict, Ambidexterity, MANAGEMENT CONTROL-SYSTEMS, STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY, TASK CONFLICT, TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION, CONTEXTUAL AMBIDEXTERITY, PRODUCT INNOVATION, EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS, MEDIATING ROLE, PIVOTAL ROLE
Type
Article
Downloads
Show all metadata
Citation
Bedford, David S., Bisbe, Josep, & Sweeney, Breda. (2019). Performance measurement systems as generators of cognitive conflict in ambidextrous firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, 21-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.010
Abstract
This study explores the decision-facilitating role of performance measurement systems (PMSs) in firms attempting to translate competence ambidexterity (i.e., the simultaneous pursuit of exploration and exploitation) into innovation ambidexterity outcomes (i.e., the achievement of both radical and incremental innovations). Drawing on paradox and organisational conflict literature, this study emphasises the role of cognitive conflict, generated by PMSs, in shaping the relationships between competence ambidexterity and innovation ambidexterity. Based on survey data from a sample of 90 Irish firms, our findings indicate that competence ambidexterity is associated with (a) the choice to have a balanced set of performance measures, and (b) the use of PMSs for frequent and intensive debate between top managers. Furthermore, the study reveals that these choices are interdependent, as they function as complements in generating cognitive conflict, which in turn drives the realisation of innovation ambidexterity outcomes. The results also show that cognitive conflict is not directly associated with the development of competence ambidexterity, but is instead generated through the conjoint action of a balanced PMS design and the use of PMSs for intensive debate. Overall, this study demonstrates the interdependent nature of choices concerning the design and use of PMSs, and the significant role of PMSs as generators of cognitive conflict in firms attempting to achieve ambidexterity. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Funder
Chartered Accountants Ireland Education Trust
Irish Research Council
Publisher
Elsevier
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.010
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
cbn
Collections
Accountancy & Finance (Scholarly Articles)