Large language model vs. traditional machine learning: Evaluating predictive models for early detection of tumor relapse
Timilsina, Mohan ; Buosi, Samuele ; Torrente, Maria ; Provencio, Mariano ; Cobo, Manuel ; Rodrıguez Abreu, Delvys ; López Castro, Rafael ; Carcereny, Enric ; Curry, Edward ; Nováček, Vít
Timilsina, Mohan
Buosi, Samuele
Torrente, Maria
Provencio, Mariano
Cobo, Manuel
Rodrıguez Abreu, Delvys
López Castro, Rafael
Carcereny, Enric
Curry, Edward
Nováček, Vít
Loading...
Publication Date
2025-05-02
Type
journal article
Downloads
Citation
Timilsina, Mohan, Buosi, Samuele, Torrente, Maria, Provencio, Mariano, Cobo, Manuel, Rodrıguez Abreu, Delvys, López Castro, Rafael, Carcereny, Enric, Curry, Edward, Nováček, Vít. (2025). Large language model vs. traditional machine learning: Evaluating predictive models for early detection of tumor relapse. Expert Systems with Applications, 283, 127641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127641
Abstract
n this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of foundational artificial intelligence (AI) models, particularly large language models (LLMs), in comparison to traditional machine learning methods for predicting tumor relapse in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With a high recurrence risk in NSCLC, early and accurate prediction is essential for improving patient outcomes and guiding treatment decisions. Our analysis utilizes a dataset of 1,348 patients, examining the performance of traditional machine learning models such as Random Forest, alongside cutting-edge LLMs like Mistral-7B, LLaMA-7B, Falcon-7B, and GPT-based models. While the Random Forest model slightly outperforms Mistral-7B in precision–recall for relapse prediction, the comparable results suggest that both approaches offer valuable insights for early relapse detection. This study underscores the potential of integrating classical machine learning with foundational AI models to enhance predictive accuracy in cancer prognosis, providing pathways for more personalized medical interventions.
Publisher
Elsevier
Publisher DOI
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International